Jeff Croft

I’m a product designer in Seattle, WA. I recently worked at Simply Measured, and previously co-founded Lendle.

Some of my past clients include Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, and the University of Washington.

I’ve authored two books on web and interactive design and spoken at dozens of conferences around the world.

I’m currently accepting contract work and considering full-time opportunities.

Filter content

Items tagged webdesign

  • Photo // 11.15.2008 // 9:44 AM // flickr

    Cartoon of me on my deathbed in .net magazine

  • Blog entry // 09.30.2008 // 4:39 PM // 82 Comments

    When can we stop talking about “supporting” certain browsers?

    Even at a progressive, Web Standards-friendly agency like Blue Flavor, the topic of which browsers to “support” comes up. Clients ask us, “Will our site be supported by IE6?,” for example. And even in the Web Standards community, there’s still a lot of talk about “dropping support” for IE6, and the like.

    But doesn’t this whole idea of browser “support” kind of go against what Web Standards is all about in the first place? Because of the way we build sites (and by we, I mean me, Blue Flavor, and most readers of this site), our projects inherently “support” every browser, from Lynx to Mosaic 1.0 to Netscape to IE to Safari to the no-name browser on your crappy flip phone.

    And yet, we still talk about browser “support.” What we really mean when we ask if a site will “support,” say, IE6, is “will the site look the same in IE6 as it does in the latest and greatest browser?” But we all know this is a silly question. Of course it won’t. And what’s more, it shouldn’t.

  • Blog entry // 09.11.2008 // 8:43 PM // 136 Comments

    Two thousand twenty two

    Today, it was brought to my attention that HTML 5 Editor Ian Hickson, in an August 27 interview with TechRepublic outlined a timetable for the “new” spec, which began life back in 2003. Hixie suggests HTML 5 will reach the “Proposed Recommendation” stage sometime in 2022. Go ahead, read it again. It’s not a typo. Two thousand twenty two.

    I immediately stopped reading. Didn’t even bother with the rest of the interview. Why? Because it just doesn’t matter. The whole concept of web standards, which I once strongly advocated for, has now become so incredibly ridiculous as to be not even worth the time and attention of serious web designers and developers.

    As I pointed out on Twitter today (much to the dismay of certain standardistas, who have previously asked me to name names instead of referring to a “shadowy cabal”): it ultimately doesn’t matter if HTML 5 is available next month, next year, or fifty years from now. Those of us who do real work in this industry know that the only thing that really matters is what specs and technologies are supported by the browsers real people use.

  • Blog entry // 09.06.2008 // 4:58 PM // 41 Comments

    Back to the great frameworks debate

    Yeah, I’m going there. I want to talk about frameworks again. Bear with me…

    I know I’ve discussed this topic at great length before, but it keeps coming up, and I still don’t have a very good understanding of all the positions people have taken on the topic. Last time I discussed this, I jumped to my own conclusions about why some people don’t like frameworks. This turned out to be a horrible idea, because people got on the defensive instead of trying to answer the simple questions I had asked. Let me be perfectly clear: I don’t care what your position is. If you don’t like frameworks, that’s fine. I’m just sincerely curious about why you don’t. I’m in no way trying to sell you on frameworks or tell you you’re wrong for not using them. I’m just trying to understand all sides. That’s what I do.

    So, with that out of the way: if you’re not a fan of frameworks, I have some questions for you. I hope you’ll take the time to answer.

By content type
Other tags in these items