> Despite the heated back-and-forth over the last few months, Clinton Wednesday hinted that she would be open to a Clinton-Obama ticket in the fall. “Well, that may, you know, be where this is headed,” Clinton told CBS Wednesday. “But, of course, we have to decide who’s on top of the ticket…”
Glad to hear it. I’d hate to see the two beat each other up so much over the course of the primaries that they can’t work together in the end. I’d definitely vote for a Clinton/Obama ticket (though I’d be much happier voting for an Obama/Clinton one).
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/05/march.4.contests/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
001 // Christian Koch // 03.05.2008 // 9:09 PM
With regards to clinton/obama or obama/clinton….
I only have to say that I much rather have a clinton/obama ticket. Why? Well, the way I see it, not being a citizen, is that the president is more of the PR machine while the VP is more for the action.
Having said that, I think Hillary has a better chance of being the “face” of the nation, while Obama has a better chance of “getting out og the limelight” and doing stuff with fresh ideas.
Does it make sense? I don’t know. Just my two cents.
Btw, great site redesign…..
002 // Jeff Croft // 03.05.2008 // 9:32 PM
Interesting! I look at it almost exactly the opposite — I think Hillary is more of a down-n-dirty, get-things-done type, whereas Obama is more likely to make a great public face of the nation.